New redating testament
This is the fifth installment of my response to Tommy Ice’s article “Answers and Clarifications for Gary De Mar.” You can reference the other four posts here, here, here, and here. 95, the question for De Mar is “What does the hour of testing refer to? There are many scholars who believe that Revelation was written before A.
Ragan Ewing in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Theology degree at Dallas Theological Seminary, a bastion of dispensational thinking. Dispensationalist writers John Ankerberg and John Weldon write, “[I]ndeed, it is becoming an increasingly persuasive argument that all the New Testament books were written before 70 A. — within a single generation of the death of Christ.2 Josh Mc Dowell takes a similar approach to dating the New Testament books: Most liberal scholars are being forced to consider earlier dates for the New Testament. Consider the following from “The Identification of Babylon the Harlot in the Book of Revelation” written by D. dissertation that was later published in book form as . His research has led to his conviction that the whole of the New Testament was written before the fall of Jerusalem in A. 70 (Robinson, RNT).3 As Gentry and others have pointed out and Ice fails to acknowledge, the pre-A. 70 date of composition for Revelation has a long and distinguished history. Robinson, no conservative himself, comes to some startling conclusions in his groundbreaking book . The problem for Tommy is that there are lots of scholars that don’t agree with him, and the list is growing every year.We shown conclusively that the gospels are post-70 CE document.
Of course late dates of gospel composition do not make believers feel comfortable since the reliability of the texts become very questionable.
Thus apologists, have tried to provide arguments for earlier dates of the composition of the gospels. Robinson in his book Redating the New Testament  argued for a pre-70 CE dating of the gospels.
.”11) Indeed Lightfoot, Westcott, Hort, and a host of others held strongly to an early dating of the book12, so much so that one author in Lightfoot’s day agreed this date to be.”13 Tommy offers no contrary scholarship to the pre-A. 70 date except to say that most scholars agree with him.
As Wilson notes, “Throughout the nineteenth century the majority of New Testament scholars favored a pre-70 dating of the Book of Revelation.”10 Robinson echoes, “It is indeed a little known fact that this [a pre-70 date] was what Hort calls ‘the general tendency of criticism’ for most of the nineteenth century…
In reality, these writers are merely returning to what was once the foregone conclusion of nearly the entire New Testament studies world.
Robinson8 have all recently supported the early date position.9 Moreover, this is far from novel.